I rest my case with him on his Afghanistan war bs while he was running for President
Why Hitchens is the man…
In one way, I suppose, I have been “in denial” for some time, knowingly burning the candle at both ends and finding that it often gives a lovely light. But for precisely that reason, I can’t see myself smiting my brow with shock or hear myself whining about how it’s all so unfair: I have been taunting the Reaper into taking a free scythe in my direction and have now succumbed to something so predictable and banal that it bores even me. Rage would be beside the point for the same reason. Instead, I am badly oppressed by a gnawing sense of waste. I had real plans for my next decade and felt I’d worked hard enough to earn it. Will I really not live to see my children married? To watch the World Trade Center rise again? To read—if not indeed write—the obituaries of elderly villains like Henry Kissinger and Joseph Ratzinger?
But I understand this sort of non-thinking for what it is: sentimentality and self-pity. Of course my book hit the best-seller list on the day that I received the grimmest of news bulletins, and for that matter the last flight I took as a healthy-feeling person (to a fine, big audience at the Chicago Book Fair) was the one that made me a million-miler on United Airlines, with a lifetime of free upgrades to look forward to. But irony is my business and I just can’t see any ironies here: would it be less poignant to get cancer on the day that my memoirs were remaindered as a box-office turkey, or that I was bounced from a coach-class flight and left on the tarmac? To the dumb question “Why me?” the cosmos barely bothers to return the reply: Why not?
Freakonomics: Penalty Kicks
Yes, I’m a little late on this one. But on a drive to check out the U of Pitt I had the chance to listen to this podcast at 4am on I-76.
The podcast covers two topics in particular: home-field advantage and penalty kicks.
The home-field advantage stuff is based on clever research by Thomas J. Dohmen (“In Support of the Supporters? Do Social Forces Shape Decisions of the Impartial?”; press summary here).
The penalty-kick findings are based on research by Levitt, Pierre-André Chiappori, and Tim Groseclose; their paper’s very sexy title is “Testing Mixed-Strategy Equilibria When Players Are Heterogeneous: The Case of Penalty Kicks in Soccer.” I will not give away its most surprising finding here, but I will give a hint, courtesy of Yeats: the center cannot hold.
If you are the kind of person who can’t get enough empirical analysis about soccer, you should definitely read Soccernomics, by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski, parts of which I found to be very good.
Breaking news: Putting people in jail can make them worse
I find myself reading Sullivan as much as Huffington these days….
The Economist revisits the incarceration debate:
Using more recent data, Bert Useem of Purdue University and Anne Piehl of Rutgers University estimate that a 10% increase in the number of people behind bars would reduce crime by only 0.5%. In the states that currently lock up the most people, imprisoning more would actually increase crime, they believe. Some inmates emerge from prison as more accomplished criminals. And raising the incarceration rate means locking up people who are, on average, less dangerous than the ones already behind bars. A recent study found that, over the past 13 years, the proportion of new prisoners in Florida who had committed violent crimes fell by 28%, whereas those inside for “other” crimes shot up by 189%. These “other” crimes were non-violent ones involving neither drugs nor theft, such as driving with a suspended licence.
Yglesias advocates the Kleiman approach.
A great quote
The white house doctor was being interviewed yesterday on NPR. She had a great line that I think was just one to remember.
“if you are going to stand out, be outstanding”
Ladies & Gentlemen, Your US Naval Academy
I visited Annapolis this weekend. Why? Because I wanted to work myself up and remember how much I loved my Submariner days. This past Saturday my family and friends we were with thought it would be nice to walk the grounds of the USNA. I think this picture says it all…

US Naval Academy Broken
This is Admirable?
I read Sullivan everyday and I agree with him on several things believe it or not. But to call what David Gregory did Sunday to Pete Sessions admirable is nauseating.
They’re still full of it. David Gregory admirably insists they give specifics. They cannot. They will not. They are fiscal frauds. Maybe at some point, the voters will realize this. Maybe even before November. These are the people who doubled the debt in eight years of growth. And they want to go back to the very same policies that made that happen.
Come on Andrew. Really? David Gregory did his job and that is the bar you set for acting admirably? It’s a sad standard to set quite frankly.
Why does David Frum get a pass?
When freaking morons and bootlicking republicans (see Bush’s speechwriter) are able to keep their careers going it’s time really think long and hard about our media. Including NPR. I had/have some respect for Sullivan. But Frum is guest posting/cross posting their this week while Sullivan is on holiday and I can’t hardly stand it.
I can’t think of a bigger dork and scumbag that seems to be able to somehow come away from shilling for the Bush administration unscathed. HELLO! Bush Speech writer anyone? He worked at Heritage? Anyone? One time the guy speaks out, one time against his conservative peers and he gets booted from his job. So, who cares? That warrants time on NPR almost daily? Now a coveted spot on Sullivan’s blog? This turd doesn’t deserve the respect he is getting these days.
Whoever his agent/pr person is needs to be rewarded big time. Bravo sir/ma’am. Bravo.
Yes, you frum, disgust me (not capitalized on purpose). You shilled for bush for years and now, somehow have been able to dislodge yourself from the worst presidency in our nations history. Nary a mention on NPR of who you were/are. It’s like you are some smoother voiced Pat Buchannon. Over time, maybe people will forget who you are and what you represented. Who you wrote for and helped create.
You can’t reshape yourself into something you aren’t frum. You are like all the rest of the those that worked for Bush. You aided in wrecking a country and penned the words that allowed Bush to do it. You used the gift of gab and words to placate and direct millions of people. You helped craft and guide a conservative message that is steering this country into depths never seen. Bravo sir. Well done. Please go get your flight suit and head to the front of our waiting F-16.
Wow, you expressed an individual opinion in the last 10 years that wasn’t shared by Kristol, Bartlett, Limbaugh. You were fired for it. And now, presto here is your career back. What’s it like to play the Victim? You have used that card well I see. Much like any conservative can and does.
Now be gone and never return cockroach.
Uganda bombing Kills a Delawarean
I didn’t know this until today via Andrew Sullivan:
The Associated Press reported the death of Nate Henn this way.
Explosions tore through crowds watching the World Cup final at a rugby club and an Ethiopian restaurant, killing at least 74 people, including a Delaware man. Police feared an al-Qaida-linked Somali militant group was behind the attacks, as Uganda’s president declared today, “We shall get them wherever they are.” Invisible Children, a San Diego, California-based aid group that helps child soldiers, identified the dead American as one of its workers, Nate Henn, 25, who was killed on the rugby field. The group said Henn called Delaware home and had played rugby at the University of Delaware while studying psychology.
Reading that, I realized that I couldn’t remember the last time I talked to Nate. How long had he been in Uganda? Quite a while, because his Facebook feed was basically all Africa all the time. That wasn’t surprising. Growing up in Delaware, Nate was part of a circle of friends who gathered at Bethel Baptist Church more than once a week. (I went to another church but liked to get together with my friends at Bethel.) He was younger than me, three years behind me at a rival high school, and in the late 1990s and early 2000s he was the overeager, energy-to-burn kid who was first to jump in the pool, first to put up his hand in a discussion, first to screw around. The image locked in my mind is him smiling victoriously after making someone exasperated.
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/the-life-of-nate-henn.html

Discussion
“But... but... but... He's a centerist! How dare you expect something different! You should be tested for drugs, you whining, ...”
anonone on I know, I know…I watch too much Fox news“I've never heard of a "conservative" losing their job in the "liberal" media. frum ain't Bill Maher or Helen Thomas ...”
delacrat on Why does David Frum get a pass?“more to the point...wingnut clueless women than ks for commenting ”
donviti on The Sarah Palin Model“Judging by your posting, the point is that women are getting more an more attracted by politics and people who ...”
Dave @ Israel on The Sarah Palin Model“It’s hard to find knowledgeable people on this topic, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks ...”
Florida Pain Clinics on Who would you be inclined to believe AZeneca or Men’s Health Mag“[...] speaks about his vote for President Obama: “I voted for this, so I deserve it.” It would be fair ...”
Common Sense Political Thought » Blog Archive » Politically correct journalism in the First State and more stories from the blogroll on The politics of change? Change we can believe in?“The difference is that Bush didn't put his propaganda on the WH website - he tried to slip it into ...”
anonone on Remember when people flipped out about this stuff?